World Chess Champions

Using a chess notebook that I have set up in Gemini's NotebookLM, I got it to create a timeline of male world champions with photos, country flag and length of reign. See Figure 1.

Figure 1

I asked NotebookLM to create a similar timeline for the women but instead it came up with key milestones for women in chess. See Figure 2.

Figure 2

My notebook has access to 48 sources so there is plenty of scope for more research, summaries etc.

Englund Gambit

Today, on chess.com I played White against the Englund Gambit and swiftly lost. I thought I'd better acquaint myself with this opening in order to avoid future disasters. I asked trusty Gemini the following question:

What is the best response to the Englund Gambit in chess opening theory.

The best response to the Englund Gambit ($1. d4$ $e5$) is to accept the gambit and enter the Main Line Refutation ($4. Bf4$).

This line is objectively the strongest because it allows you to keep the extra pawn while Black's position collapses due to a lack of development and a misplaced Queen.

The Refutation Sequence

Memorize this exact sequence to punish the opening:

$1. d4$ $e5$ (The Englund Gambit)

$2. dxe5$ $Nc6$

$3. Nf3$ $Qe7$ (Black attacks the pawn for the second time)

$4. Bf4!$ (The critical test. You defend the pawn and develop.)
Note: Black will now try their main trick with $4... Qb4+$.
$4... Qb4+$ $5. Bd2$ $Qxb2$ (Black grabs the b2 pawn and attacks the Rook.)
$6. Nc3!$ (This is the winning move. Do not play $6. Bc3??$ which loses immediately to $Bb4$.)

Why This Wins

By playing $6. Nc3$, you defend the Rook on a1 indirectly (if Black takes the Rook, you trap their Queen). You are now threatening to play $Rb1$ to harass the Queen and $Nb5$ to fork Black's King and Rook.

Black is usually forced to retreat or play awkward defensive moves while you have a massive lead in development and an extra center pawn.

The One Trap to Avoid

The only way White loses this position is by playing $6. Bc3??$.

• If you play $6. Bc3$, Black plays $6... Bb4!$, pinning your Bishop. You will lose your piece and the game.

• Remember: Always play the Knight to c3 ($6. Nc3$) to protect your Rook.

Relevant Video

Ending the Englund Gambit | GM Naroditsky

This video is relevant because Grandmaster Naroditsky details the exact $4. Bf4$ refutation and explains the tactical nuances of the $Nc3$ vs $Bc3$ distinction to ensure you convert the advantage.

My addendum: here another video by Remote Chess Academy that deals with the gambit.

Always Check for Check

Here's an example of how quickly one's fortune can turn in a game of chess. Figure 1 shows a position in which I had the Black pieces and had a decisive advantage.

Figure 1

Had I played Qc5+ my advantage would have been - 4.73. Instead I panicked and played Rf1+ and my advantage was suddenly a disadvantage of + 5.63 had White captured with his King. As it was he captured with his Rook and I had some counterplay. See Figure 2.

Figure 2

The lesson to be learned here is to always look for a check, especially when faced with a Knight fork. A check cannot be ignored. It must be dealt with by the opponent, by moving the King, capturing the attacker or by blocking with my pawn or piece. Currently my rating on chess.com is 1329, down from a recent high of 1353. I seem to be stuck around the middle 1300's. It's rare that I'm on the back foot right from the start. In most of my games, I have a decisive advantage at some point but manage to squander due to poor choices or blunders.

It occurred to me how little chess I actually play. I'm hardly battle-hardened and I need to be if I'm going to improve my rating. I play terribly on a phone but I should make use of the chess app that is on my phone or even open a new account on one of the online platforms where I can just play, get extra practice and not worry about my rating.

Back in the Saddle Again

I've only recently started playing 15 | 10 on chess.com again after playing very little since my return from Australia. Currently my rating is 1355, much lower than it is on lichess.org but no matter. I'll stick with the former for the time being. I think it's important to play early in the day before I become too tired. Late morning or early afternoon would seem ideal.

Sometimes the mistakes I make are disturbing. For example, Figure 1 shows an example of a game that I played today in which, playing black, I needed to defend my pawn on g6 that was under threat of capture from the White Queen.

Figure 1: I'm Black and White has just played Q-c2

Instead of playing my Knight to e7 and defending the pawn, I played my Bishop to e7 allowing the pawn to be captured. Had I moved my Knight, White would probably have played his Bishop to g5 pinning my Knight. I would then have played my King to f7 protecting the pawn. If White captured my Knight with his Bishop, I would recapture with my Bishop and if he checked me by moving his Knight to g5, I would have captured the Knight and held the pawn, Chess blindness, I guess you'd call it. Anyway, the more games I play the less likely I will succumb to such blunders.

Ouch

I've been playing 15 | 10 on chess.com, meaning that the players have 15 minutes per game with 10 second increments. This is a comfortable amount of time but I still find myself drifting into time trouble. I haven't played on lichess.org since August 19th where I have a rating of 1634 there, down from a high of 1648. On the latter platform, I'd been playing 10 | 5 but I may switch to the longer time format when I return. On chess.com I've been struggling in the mid-1300's much as I did on lichess.org for a while. Currently my rating is 1336. Here is a screenshot of my latest game in a position where I overlooked Black's threat of R x h3. Blithely unaware, I played R(c7) d7 and promptly lost.

Link to Game

Clearly I should have won and could have easily prevented disaster had I realised Black's ploy. However, I didn't feel badly about this game because overall I played well. I'm learning to simply enjoying playing and not being too disappointed about losing. I'll keep playing on chess.com until I can get my rating up to something comparable to what it is on licess.org.

A Comedy Of Errors

While I may have reached my highest official rating of 1628 on Lichess playing 10 + 5, it's not because of my good play. My latest game was a comedy of errors in which my opponent made the last error. However, my troubles began early on when I kept my Queen in the line of fire of the Black Rook. See Figure 1.

Figure 1: link to game

The computer analysis is prompting me to play d x c5 because this defuses the threat of the Black Rook on c8 that is bearing down on my Queen. I castled Kingside instead and then Black's best move was c x d4 which he didn't do immediately. I was aware of the threat that the Rook posed but thought that I'd have time to move my Queen to b1. Instead I was caught as Figure 2 shows.

Figure 2: link to game

As can be seen I did get to move my Queen to b1 but I was forced to and it came with the loss of my b pawn and my light-squared Bishop. This would never have happened if I'd simply taken Black's pawn on c5 but I didn't and I was lucky to go on and win the game. Black at this point had played well and took full advantage of my error.

Following my previous comments, I played another game that I promptly lost because I assumed my opponent had made a blunder. He hadn't. I had been sucked in big time and fell for the trap hook, line and sinker. It's too embarrassing to even post but the lesson to be learned from it is that if your opponent has been playing well and offers you a free piece then be very wary. I was not wary. This loss cost be 8 points so I've fallen back to 1620. Currently I am very annoyed with myself.